Abstract
In this experiment, we shall:
Observe and demonstrate the interaction between
the magnetic moment of the electron spin with an external magnetic field.
Determine the characteristic parameter of this
interaction, namely the Landé g-factor for spin (denoted gs)
Introduction
When we applied an external magnetic field and
then by supplying electromagnetic energy on a paramagnetic solid material
(which have unpaired electron spins), transitions can be induced between spin
states. The resulting absorption spectra are described as electron spin
resonance (ESR) or electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR).
ESR is a purely quantum mechanical effect. It relates
to the interaction of an external magnetic field to an electron’s magnetic
moment, which is a result of intrinsic spin. The spin of an electron may be up
or down. This implies that in the presence of an external magnetic field, one
spin state will be higher in energy than other. More specially, the spin with a
moment pointing in the direction of the external field is lowest in energy. These
states have an energy E, as either:
U = -µ.Bs = -µsz B =±(1/2) gs µB B (1)
Where g is the Lande’ factor, µB is the
Bohr magneton (a constant), and B is the value of the external magnetic field.
Thus, the change in energy from the negative to the positive spin state can be
written:
DE = g µBB (2)
Therefore, because g and µB are constants, there are pairs of values of the energy E and of the external field B that satisfy Eq. (2) and result in a transition of spin states. At commonly attainable magnetic field strengths the corresponding energy lies in the radio-frequency (RF) regime. Where the general expression for the energy of a photon applies:
E = hv (3)
Where E is the energy of an RF photon, h is
Plank’s constant, and ν is the frequency of the photon. When a photon of energy
E is incident on an electron in a field of strength B electron resonance will
be observed.
Spin of the electron, The Landé g-factor.
The idea of electron spin and its associated magnetic moment was first introduced by George Uhlenbeck and Samuel Goudsmit to explain the fine structure in atomic optical spectra. A proper relativistic quantum mechanical treatment of the hydrogen atom leads naturally to the electron possessing, in addition to its mass m and charge e, an intrinsic spin angular momentum with quantum number s = 1/2. The new quantum property, the spin, obeys the same quantization rules as those governing orbital angular momentum of atomic electrons. The spin vector S has magnitude :
S = (S(S
+ 1))^1/2ћ (4)
In the presence of a magnetic field, the component
of spin parallel to the field (z direction) is quantized. It has two possible
values,
Sz
= msħ = ± (1/2)ħ
(5)
Since an electron has
a charge and an angular momentum, it also has a magnetic moment, µL, proportional to the orbital angular momentum,
given by
μl = gl (e/2m)
l (6)
Where gl is
the electron orbital momentum g-factor.
The electron also has a magnetic moment, µs,
proportional to its spin, and it is given by:
μs=
-gs (e/2m)S = ±(1/2) gs (eħ /2m)
(7)
where gs is the electron spin g-factor. According
to Dirac’s theory, gs is precisely 2.
Transitions between the states can therefore be
excited by photons of frequency nr, given
by
hvr = gs μB B (8)
Free Radicals
The electrons that we will manipulate are located in the paramagnetic molecule Diphenyl-Picryl-Hydrazyl (DPPH). DPPH is pictured below; notice the unpaired electron. This electron is also very weakly bound to the nitrogen atom. The combination of these two properties makes this molecule ideal for studying the magnetic properties of the electron.
Figure 3 shows a block diagram depicting the experimental setup. There are essentially two circuits: The first controls and monitors the RF signal driving of the electrons (at left), and the second controls the external magnetic field (right). You should observe the output of the absorption of the DPPH on one channel of the oscilloscope (DC couple the o-scope channel) and the voltage across the resistor on the other channel.
Helmholtz Coils
The magnetic field is provided by
a pair of Helmholtz coils in a series connection with an AC and a DC power
supply. The
average magnetic field can be determined from the current in the coil which is
measured by the DC ammeter.
The characteristic which distinguishes Helmholtz coils from other sources of magnetic field is that the distance between the coils is equal to their radius (R).
The magnetic field midway between the coils and on their axis is given by:
B= 8μ0NI / √125 R
where I is the current and N is the number of turns in each coil.
The RF unit
For the typical magnetic fields used in this
experiment, photons of frequencies in the range ~25-50MHz are required for the transitions
referred to above. These are provided by a short coil connected to a high
frequency oscillator. The magnetic field of this coil is perpendicular to that
provided by the Helmholtz coils, an arrangement that results in a perturbing
torque acting on the electron’s spin dipole moment. When the oscillator
frequency matches the resonance condition, the impedance of the oscillator circuit
decreases and the current increases. A DC voltage proportional to this current is
fed to the Y-input of the oscilloscope.
Methodology
We will use:
- DPPH sample,
- ESR unit: ESR resonator with field coils and
ESR power supply
- Oscilloscope
- Teslameter, digital
Procedure
* The setup was ready as the figure above.
* We inserted the sample into large RF coil,
then we put the sample at the middle between Helmholtz coils.
* We turned the oscilloscope on, power supply,
RF unit and the multimeter at DC amperes.
* We started with 35 MHz up to 75 for the first
coil and recorded the current value (the current value was 2I not I).
* We put the second coil and repeat the
previous steps starting from 80MHz up to 125MHz.
Data Analysis
Table1: The current
of Helmholtz coils (A), resonance
frequency (MHz)
2I(A) |
f(MHz) |
0.33 |
20 |
0.43 |
25 |
0.5 |
30 |
0.58 |
35 |
0.66 |
40 |
0.74 |
45 |
0.83 |
50 |
0.92 |
55 |
1.02 |
60 |
1.08 |
65 |
1.18 |
70 |
1.24 |
75 |
1.36 |
80 |
1.43 |
85 |
1.52 |
90 |
1.59 |
95 |
1.67 |
100 |
1.76 |
105 |
1.93 |
110 |
2 |
|
2.09 |
|
2.13 |
|
ΔI=±0.01 A
N=320 ( Number of turns)
R=6.8 cm ( raduis of one coil)
2I(A) |
I (A) |
f(MHz) |
B T |
0.33 |
0.165 |
20 |
0.00047685 |
0.43 |
0.215 |
25 |
0.00062135 |
0.5 |
0.25 |
30 |
0.0007225 |
0.58 |
0.29 |
35 |
0.0008381 |
0.66 |
0.33 |
40 |
0.0009537 |
0.74 |
0.37 |
45 |
0.0010693 |
0.83 |
0.415 |
50 |
0.00119935 |
0.92 |
0.46 |
55 |
0.0013294 |
1.02 |
0.51 |
60 |
0.0014739 |
1.08 |
0.54 |
65 |
0.0015606 |
1.18 |
0.59 |
70 |
0.0017051 |
1.24 |
0.62 |
75 |
0.0017918 |
1.36 |
0.68 |
80 |
0.0019652 |
1.43 |
0.715 |
85 |
0.00206635 |
1.52 |
0.76 |
90 |
0.0021964 |
1.59 |
0.795 |
95 |
0.00229755 |
1.67 |
0.835 |
100 |
0.00241315 |
1.76 |
0.88 |
105 |
0.0025432 |
1.93 |
0.965 |
110 |
0.00278885 |
2 |
1 |
115 |
0.00289 |
2.09 |
1.045 |
120 |
0.00302005 |
2.13 |
1.065 |
125 |
0.00307785 |
To estimate the true value of our slope and
y-intercept we use the least square method:
Where a is the intercept and b is the slope, we can find the error in a (δa) and error in b (δb) using the following equations:
where s is the standard deviation
B
T |
f(MHz) |
B^2 |
x*y |
(y-a-bx)^2 |
0.00047685 |
20 |
2.27386E-07 |
0.009537 |
44.14918224 |
0.00062135 |
25 |
3.86076E-07 |
0.01553375 |
32.18162422 |
0.0007225 |
30 |
5.22006E-07 |
0.021675 |
27.84430797 |
0.0008381 |
35 |
7.02412E-07 |
0.0293335 |
23.82080494 |
0.0009537 |
40 |
9.09544E-07 |
0.038148 |
20.11111516 |
0.0010693 |
45 |
1.1434E-06 |
0.0481185 |
21.7520854 |
0.00119935 |
50 |
1.43844E-06 |
0.0599675 |
23.45740378 |
0.0013294 |
55 |
1.7673E-06 |
0.073117 |
31.33918713 |
0.0014739 |
60 |
2.17238E-06 |
0.088434 |
16.41105147 |
0.0015606 |
65 |
2.43547E-06 |
0.101439 |
23.09679592 |
0.0017051 |
70 |
2.90737E-06 |
0.119357 |
10.61995211 |
0.0017918 |
75 |
3.21055E-06 |
0.134385 |
26.67366333 |
0.0019652 |
80 |
3.86201E-06 |
0.157216 |
17.58171107 |
0.00206635 |
85 |
4.2698E-06 |
0.17563975 |
19.11811262 |
0.0021964 |
90 |
4.82417E-06 |
0.197676 |
11.56561952 |
0.00229755 |
95 |
5.27874E-06 |
0.21826725 |
9.028293602 |
0.00241315 |
100 |
5.82329E-06 |
0.241315 |
10.13838582 |
0.0025432 |
105 |
6.46787E-06 |
0.267036 |
63.47850827 |
0.00278885 |
110 |
7.77768E-06 |
0.3067735 |
48.94037815 |
0.00289 |
115 |
8.3521E-06 |
0.33235 |
51.48222217 |
0.00302005 |
120 |
9.1207E-06 |
0.362406 |
20.04401341 |
0.00307785 |
125 |
9.47316E-06 |
0.38473125 |
15153.95468 |
0.03900055 |
1595 |
8.30719E-05 |
3.382456 |
15706.7891 |
Slope= 27.127(+-)0.251
gs= h*slope/Mᵦ =1.93818
The theoretical value of gs=2.0023, we will find
the percentage error:
𝐏.𝐄 = |𝐠𝐬(𝐞𝐱𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐞𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐲)−𝐠𝐬(𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐲)| /𝐠𝐬𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐨𝐫𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐲 *100%
= 3.2023%
Error in ∆gs = gs(exp)*∆slope/slope
Error propagation in gs = (+-)0.01793
∆f=+-0.01 MHz
Conclusion
1- The relation between the frequency and the applied magnetic field is linear according to equation 8.
2- The interaction of an external magnetic field
with an electron spin depends upon the magnetic moment associated with the
spin.
3- Resonance is the absorption of energy from the
weak alternating magnetic field of the microwave when its frequency corresponds
to the difference between two spin states.
4- Free radical, such as DPPH that we used in our experiment exhibit g-factors very close to the value for free electrons = 2.0023.
References
1- Practical physics (0342411) manual.
2- https://homepage.physics.uiowa.edu/~fskiff/Physics_132/New%20Lab%20Manual/int_lab_man/pdfs/A4_ESR_v6.pdf
Comments
Post a Comment
If you have any comment please write it down, we will happy to read it.